The philosophy of literature, which is one of the things he touches on, is very interesting and the fact that I to I am not a literary theorist. The philosophy of literature, which is one of the things he touches on, is very interesting and the fact that I took the first year of a philosophy degree alongside my first year of literature helps, too , but it mostly just reminded me that I'm 'meant' to read Foucault and Freud and Lacan and goodness knows who else, and while I acknowledge the work they did and the work people do using their theories and so on, it's really not something that appeals to me.
I feel like a bad English Lit student, until I remember that my university must've let me graduate with First Class Honours for a reason, and since I didn't touch literary theory with so much as a barge pole, it must be okay that I don't. But I probably will read Foucault. View 2 comments.
Apr 22, William rated it really liked it. This is a methodical course through the theories of language that underlie our ideas about what literature is and means. Still, Eagleton's service to the history of ideas is usually always valuable, even if the reasons for the journey might not become immediately clear. The notion of strategy within the dynamics of reading and writing - and within view o This is a methodical course through the theories of language that underlie our ideas about what literature is and means. The notion of strategy within the dynamics of reading and writing - and within view of Badiou's horizon of literature as political event - is a well-placed contribution, but instead of exploring Badiou's thought in terms of strategies for reading, the book only sets the stage for the encounter by rummaging through the already well-documented 20th C.
Along these lines, however, the book performs a synthesis on the opposition between phenomenological and analytical approaches to language, treating both quite thoroughly and providing the reader with a well-considered perspective. Mar 03, Tracy rated it really liked it. Got lost often reading this book, which is sort of a snappy survey of literary criticism's history.
Wish I could start from scratch and take Literature courses again. On essences: "Since the word 'love' is not normally admissible in literary-theoretical discussion, however, and is plainly indecorous in such a context, I shall pass over these suggestions as abruptly as I broached them. In any case, the point is not much use when it comes to considering the essence of unlovable phenomena like slugs or screwdrivers.
12222 Asian American Literature Festival at the Library of Congress
A ham sandwich is not literature even for the most generously pluralistic of postmodernists. View 1 comment. May 29, Peter rated it it was amazing. Mar 19, Ann Michael rated it really liked it. It took me awhile to get through this text. And, if I say so myself, I am not exactly a novice in this area. So--it's a difficult book despite the blurbs that commend him for his 'readability.
- Weak Scale Supersymmetry;
- Mapping Class Groups and Moduli Spaces of Riemann Surfaces.
- The Event of Literature | Socialist Review.
- Beckett, Derrida, and the Event of Literature | Asja Szafraniec.
- Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 7th International Conference, CICLing 2006, Mexico City, Mexico, February 19-25, 2006. Proceedings.
So if you are up for the challenge, consider delving into Eagleton. But it will necessarily be a delve. You'll tire easily and be overwhelmed. Much food for thought, as the saying goes. I'll be mulling over his concepts and his controversies for some time. Jul 09, Grammarian rated it it was amazing. I finally reached page , the last page of the index that follows the chapter notes. Spoiler notice: the last word of the text is 'paranoia. Nov 20, Ivan Labayne rated it really liked it. Jan 03, Daniel rated it it was ok.
Some of Eagleton's work is valuable, but this book was a waste of my time for the most part. Jan 23, Christopher McQuain rated it liked it. Aug 11, Gary D. And you can also look at pictures of past Festivals. A very special feature of the Wells Festival of Literature has always been our popular Literary Lunches.
Continue reading about our Literary Lunches. A Literary Lunch makes a fitting appetiser for the talk to follow, and the speaker almost always joins us to enjoy a delicious light meal: tasty homemade soup accompanied by wonderful artisan breads, followed by a mouth-watering dessert. Martin Kemp Living with Leonardo At each event the speaker and interviewer where applicable will join lunch guests in the Dining Hall for lunch at Seats will also be reserved for lunch guests in Cedars Hall for the 2pm talk. Although created with book clubs in mind, this event is open to all.
We do however recommend that you read the featured book in advance so that you can gain the very most from the discussion.
- Migration from Printing Inks A Food Contact Study.
- The Event of Literature.
- Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT ’90: Workshop on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Aarhus, Denmark, May 21–24, 1990 Proceedings;
- Literature and Event: Reformulations of the Literary in the 21st Century!
- Sales Have Ended.
- by Grant Hamilton.
- The Event of Literature by Terry Eagleton – review.
If you belong to a book club, please make sure we have the details so that we can contact you. While interesting, I find the strategy he advises largely inert. In no way does my understanding of Jane Eyre feel enriched by his somewhat Marxist understanding of the book, even though it attends to literary tools as much as any formalist. Like many literary theories, ultimately it sounds self-fulfilling as if when we look at every book through a Freudian viewpoint we will find a vapid argument between the id, ego, and superego, or for a Marxist, the proletariat struggling for identity in society of commodities.
Sontag essentially makes this claim in Against Interpretation.
What then remains for us to take away from this book? How will all of his arguments affect the way we read or talk about writing or art? When we review a book of fiction should we simply summarize the plot then check off the five components Eagleton provides to see how this book accomplishes its task? Obviously not.
Rather, if I can pierce through the density of these myriad arguments, Eagleton calls for a more self-aware analysis of books. We make statements, carelessly, referring to a novel as morally enlightening, or transcendent, or cathartic when he wants us to investigate what these terms possibly mean. At this point, however, we run into a wall when attempting to talk about literature. For Eagleton, a discussion of literature entails a destabilization of our assumptions about literature.
Programme — Association for Philosophy and Literature
What he leaves unanswered is how to translate all of this abstract argumentation into more refined discussions of the actual texts. In a book review, we cannot at every turn qualify our statements i. To that extent, Eagleton leaves the reader wanting. He fails to accomplish this loftier task of concretizing his conclusions in a compelling way. However, he acutely points out the pitfalls of our current state of unenlightened phenomenological literary criticism. She barely explores her assumptions about authorial intent, novelistic coherence, and the nature of fiction.
Consequently, we need to find a balance in which we can still make phenomenological critiques of art, the most pervasive form of criticism today, and yet resuscitate the desire and ability to grapple with these larger questions. Reading through the arguments, even barely understanding some of the subtleties between the different thinkers he quotes, engenders a heady rush of intellectual excitement, akin to the feeling of reading about the God particle without completely understanding the physics behind it.
It lends a weightiness to literature, to writing, to criticism. Joe Winkler is a freelance writer living in the Upper West Side.